Sold Your Company for Stock? You Haven’t Really Been Paid Yet.
You and your co-founders built the company, and a bigger one offers to buy it, paying some or all of the price in its own stock.
Sometimes you don't have a better option: it's this, bankruptcy, or a fire sale for pennies. Other times, the buyer has a strong profile but wants to conserve cash, so it offers equity instead.
Either way, this kind of deal can be perfectly rational — even a great move. But both scenarios leave you in the same place: holding stock you can't readily sell, exposed to tax risk you don't control, and with no say over when any of that changes.
IF THE BUYER IS A PRIVATE COMPANY, ITS STOCK IS RESTRICTED.
It usually isn't registered, so there's a holding period—often a year or more—before you can sell, and even then only under conditions. A mixed group of buyer stock recipients complicates the structure, since the exemption that makes the sale legal depends on who each recipient is.
THE TAX CAN CUT AGAINST YOU.
These deals are often structured as a tax-free reorganization: no tax due on the buyer's shares at closing, your taxable gain riding along until you sell. That's the good case, but it doesn't always hold. If the deal doesn't qualify—often because you get paid too much cash, or it just wasn't structured correctly to qualify—you could owe capital gains tax at closing on the full value of stock you can't sell. Worst case: you pay the tax, the stock later falls, and you've been taxed on value you never received.
EVEN IF YOU CAN SELL, THERE MAY BE NO ONE TO SELL TO.
Unless the buyer is a "unicorn" that looks ready to IPO, there's rarely a real market for private shares. Your liquidity most likely turns on the buyer's own exit, probably years out.
DON'T EXPECT EQUAL DISCLOSURE
Even though you're as much a stock buyer as a seller, you almost never get the same detailed information, reps, and warranties about the buyer that it demands about you. And because the buyer is private, that lack of information can make these new buyer shares a real gamble.
If you go back asking for the disclosures, reps, and warranties that you had to give, you'll usually get shot down—first, because the leverage gap is usually wide enough that the request reads as overreaching; second, because everything the buyer puts on the record about its own business is ammunition for a stockholder suit if its stock later craters, so buyers avoid it.
But "almost never" isn't "never." You sometimes have enough leverage to insist on some warranties about the one or two areas that matter most—the buyer's IP, say, or its financials.
None of this makes a stock deal a bad deal. Sometimes it's the best one on the table. But it's very different from being paid in cash: "$3M in buyer stock" and "$3M" are different worlds, not just different words, and the gulf is timing, liquidity, and control.
Be aware of what you're actually being offered before you sign.
ASK A QUESTION OR SCHEDULE A MEETING/CALL.
Disclaimer: This article constitutes attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. MGLS publishes this article for information purposes only. Nothing within is intended as legal advice.